Good article, no arguments with any of your points, but there really doesn't need to be any kind of "gateway" for Danny Rand or Luke Cage to appear. For different reasons, both have deep, vested interests in New York City as well as obvious connections to Murdoch, so both would be highly motivated to the effort to undermine the fascist criminal mayor. As a result, failing to include them would actually make no sense whatsoever.

Great points, but an additional fact is that Danny Rand would have a direct stake in what's happening in New York, as he is essentially the Bruce Wayne of New York City. As a result, it couldn't make more perfect sense for him to be involved in Murdoch's campaign to free the city. Conversely, it would be absurd for him not to be included. I really hope that the writers understand this.

"we get to do something so new and so different."

Really? You mean, so new and different compared to last two iterations of FF, which were both in their own standalone universes without other super heroes, and which no one cares about? It's amazing that they can say this with a straight face.

What a sad and tragic loss. In addition to everything else written in the article, he was a true fan who loved writing for us. I how he would actually respond to our posts and questions when trekmovie was a new site, too. What a guy.

Agree with Andy. And, simply put, S31 was just bad. Nothing more need be said.

I've always had a problem with saying that ST3 was a bad, or disappointing movie. I accept that it would have been extremely difficult to ever release a movie as good as ST2, especially back to back, but ST3 was and is a solid movie and a worthy member of the only true trilogy in the Trek movie universe.